RESEARCH OVERVIEW
Photo by Rachel Griffin
There are three resident killer whale populations found between Washington state and Alaska. These whales are called residents, because they spend about half of the year foraging in inland waters, and rely almost exclusively on salmon as prey. The southern resident killer whales (SRKW) are the most threatened population. They experienced an unexplained 20.4% population decline between 1995-2001. The population remained stable from 2001-2005. However, five individuals (5%) were lost in 2006 and seven (8%) were lost in 2008 (Center for Whale Research, pers. comm.). This is an alarming rate of decline for an already small population.
Three primary hypotheses have been proposed to explain the decline:
1) Decline in the whales’ primary prey, Chinook salmon;
2) Disturbance from private and commercial whale watching vessels; and
3) Exposure to high levels of toxicants (e.g. PCB, PBDE and DDT), which are stored in the whales’ fat.
Hypotheses 2 and 3 likely interact with Hypothesis 1 since the impacts of boats and toxicants may be exacerbated by the lack of prey.
Photo: Kelley Balcomb-Bartok
Understanding the relative impacts of these three pressures is vital to mitigating further SRKW losses given the considerable economic and political impacts associated with any one of them. The Center for Conservation Biology is partitioning these pressures by using a combination of noninvasive measures of stress and nutrition hormones as well as toxicants from feces. Scat samples are located by Conservation Canines (specially trained scat detection dogs) that are able to locate samples floating on the water from as far away as a nautical mile from the whales and, therefore, from distances unlikely to disturb the whales.
METHODs
Tucker
We rely on Tucker, a Conservation Canine, to help us acquire enough scat samples to test these hypotheses. The boat moves perpendicular to the wind with Tucker and his handler secure on the bow of the boat. However, the specific orientation of the boat is varied with whale movements relative to wind direction so that the wind blows the scent from any scat in the water towards the dog: For whales moving in the direction of the wind-the boat moves immediately behind the whale(s) and conducts an upwind zigzag away from the whales. The width of the zigzag is the same as the area covered by the whales. For whales moving into the wind-the boat follows in a zigzag >100 meters behind the whales. For whales moving perpendicular to the wind-the boat positions at a 45° angle, again > 100 meters behind the group of whales.
Figure 1a. Tucker looks for whale scat - © Fred Fellman
Tucker indicates that he has detected a killer whale scat in the water by changing his behavior from passive (Figure 1a) to highly animated (Figure 1b). When this occurs, the handler directs the boat driver to steer into the wind. Tucker maintains his position for as long as the scent concentration is increasing. As as soon as the scent concentration begins to decrease, Tucker stands up and looks backwards, indicating the scent is behind him. We respond by turning the boat perpendicular to the wind until the dog’s animation returns. The boat again turns into the wind. We repeat this process until we arrive at the sample.
Figure 1b. Tucker's change in behavior upon detecting a killer whale scat. Note the difference in his body position compared to the previous photo.
The dog is rewarded by a game of tug-o-war with his WestPaw ball as soon as the sample is collected. Once spotted, the sample (Figure 2) is collected with a net or specially designed poop scooper.
Each sample is extracted and assayed for stress, reproductive and nutrition hormones (glucocorticoids, GCs; tri-iodothyronine, T3, testosterone, estrogens and progestins), as well as for toxicants (PCB, PBDE and DDT congeners).
Figure 2. Whale poop
These physiological products are then examined over time and in relation to independent measures of Fraser River Chinook salmon abundance (the primary prey of the killer whales while in the study area) and boat densities over time. Scientists at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center also analyze our samples for prey DNA to see what the whale ate, and host DNA to determine the individual whale’s identity and sex.
RESULTS
Preliminary evidence indicates that conditions of low prey make everything harder on the whales. Boat densities have a greater impact when prey is low and killer whales burn fat stores, releasing toxins sequestered in fat into circulation. These results suggest that restoring fish should be the highest priority as it can buffer impacts of these other stressors, and in the case of toxins, reduce their impacts until they can be cleaned up.
The toxin work is just getting underway. Thus far, we have validated our ability to acquire PCB, PBDE and DDT congeners from killer whale scat. The relative concentrations of these congeners are similar to those measured in killer whale biopsy samples.
CLOSING REMARKS
Migitation efforts to increase the abundance and quality of available prey to Southern resident killer whales will be an important first step towards assuring SRKW recovery. Toxin work will further contribute to understanding the effects of environmental pressures on this population.
COLLABORATORS
This work is being conducted as part of the dissertation research of Katherine Ayres and Jessica Lundin in our Center. Collaborators include the Center for Whale Research, the Whale Museum , the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and Cascadia Research.
FUNDING
Support for this project is being provided by:
*The Washington Sea Grant, University of Washington, pursuant to NOAA Award No. NA10OAR417005
*NOAA, Northwest Fisheries Science Center
*The Canadian Consulate General
*The Center for Conservation Biology
*The Northwest Science Association
Follow Conservation Canines and the SRKW study on Facebook!